WORK FAST
My technique ALLOWS you to do just that - easily record the true spirit of a song and singer and musicians without spending valuble creative time realigning each take /
punchin point. Using my method you WORK FAST.
The Artist has no time to worry about gear, but must concentrate on their PERFORMANCE. Thus if you are good at PRODUCING (getting blood out of stone from your performers) then you will have H&S.
If I didn't mention that I hardly apply compression, then I am doing so now to clear up that matter. I never said I added compression. Read what I wrote. I'll add this point to my "blog" that use of compression is minimal and the gear is used to split signal and just add a bit of transparent punch (
RNC 1773).
Mic placement in a carpeted interior vocal booth is just that when it comes to vocals and amps recorded in a vocal booth so as to not disturb neighbors in NYC. There is no room sound. Distance of mic to sound source and type of mic / mic preamp matters here more. Beatles songs had tracks made by adding effects (McCartney swirling wine glasses in a tape loop as an effect under music in a song) as well as tracks recorded in
EMI Studio #2 with its large echo room sound. Most impressive: the Beatles could always sing in 3 part harmony and never had a bad day -
Emerick.
Geoff
Emerick spoke about recording in series. On the
internet he describes taking an out from his board and using that as an input - and doing this again and again - being afraid he'd blow up all his tubes in the board. Doing this with compressors as well. Again and again.
In his talk at
Legandary Studios
Emerick spoke about abusing gear. Getting great sound. Recording vocals through compressors in series.
Emerick made great recordings. Beatles sound is what it is. Legendary. Is
Emerick wrong because he added "effects" to his sound. That's what Beatles' music was all about!!! Strawberry Fields!!
TO COMPRESS OR NOT
What you must ask is the degree of compression I use. Doesn't that matter? Sure it does!!! I use hardly any at all!
When signal enters the 1st
DBX 160 it's hardly compressed at all. This unit acts as a means to divide the signal. Going into the
RNC 1773 as
Supernice (doubled compressors in series) is adding an effect - but again I use this only slightly to add to the presence: It's end result is very transparent.
Going to tape - as we all know - is an effect in its own right. Compression from tape at 15
IPS on a
Studer family machine (
Revox PRMK1) is quite a difference from a digital signal recorded direct into MONA from the 1st
DBX 160A - which is set to almost NO compression.
Analog tape sounds better to us when recorded right. Using a
Neumann TLM 103 mic and a
Telefunken V76 preamp creates great sound: even-ordered harmonics. Either you like it or you don't: the famous REDD 47 in
EMI was an alleged modded
Telefunken V72. I've heard people say
EMI was just too cheap to buy the real deal. Downside of using analog tape is cost and time to align analog to digital templates as I describe.
Note: In one recent session, I had a bass player plug bass DI into the MONA - we asked each other what was wrong? then I plugged the Bass into the
Telefunken V76 / Mona - and the sound was that of a lion not a thin mouse. What you prefer in sound is your opinion.
The right use of gear can make a performance by highlighting what is happening.
Fairchild 660 compressors.
Pultec EQ. LA2A compressors. Further clearing away of negative frequencies and
boosing highs and lows by Parametric
EQ is also recommended as that action adds further punch and removes harsh sound characteristic of the mic at hand.
CREATIVE MOMENT
Recording Heart and Soul - I agree the actual performance says it all. My method allows an engineer / producer to capture the performer in the creative "bubble" before it bursts. In the moment where inspiration and spirit exist as they are transformed into the energy of the soul captured forever in song. The creative moment in analog. In all its' rugged glory and gold.